Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts

Sunday, December 15, 2013

Is "The Catcher in the Rye" Terrible?


Holden Caulfield is one of the most hated characters in literature. His book is banned in several schools, parents do not want their kids to be influenced by him, and kids do not like him. Yes, I know there are kids in this world that do like Holden, but I have not met one that does yet. The only person I know that does is myself. I am writing this to analyze The Catcher in the Rye and examine why people love or hate this book.

The Cather in the Rye is not a book for everyone. The tone is depressing and dark, which already does not appeal to people. The book is more of a character study rather than an actual story. The author puts Holden in different scenarios and writes his reactions to them. It is completely understandable why people do not like Holden or the material covered in it. Ironically the main problem is Holden alienates himself from the reader because an average person cannot relate to him. I would never do most of the things he does in the book and the same goes for other people I know. Parents do not want kids to read about someone their age smoking, swearing, drinking, running away, thinking about sex constantly, and paying for a hooker. Also Holden's language is foul. In a book like To Kill A Mockingbird, the harsh language fits with the harsh themes and times the author wants to represent. However, Holden can come off as an asshole at certain points in the book. Many readers have pointed out that Holden is a hypocrite because he calls people phonies for being deceptive, but he acts like a phony because he deceives himself by thinking he is not like the people he labels as phonies.

Obviously I have admitted that the book is not perfect, but the philosophy is. I am not referring to the philosophy Holden is trying to get across, but the philosophy Salinger is. Holden is supposed to be phony. A lot of people think Salinger created Holden to be this perfect deity for young adults, but he did not. Readers are supposed to learn how not to be like Holden, but at the same time they should realize they are like Holden. It is complicated to explain, but basically everyone is a phony. We all at one point or another deceive people or ourselves. Holden points this out, but fails to recognize that he is a phony himself. The point Salinger is trying to get across is that you should not judge other people because you are no better than them. Pointing out someone's flaws does not make you flawless. However, in society people judge each other constantly and convince themselves that they are superior. This creates a society where we hold people up to a standard that not everyone meets. This creates alienation.

As a teenager reading this book Holden taught me how to face my fears. Holden runs away from his future trying to prevent it. He even tries to prevent other kids from growing up. Holden represents the loss of innocence. Not only does he realize the world is a mean spirited place, but also requires him to grow up. Holden wants to be treated as an adult, but at the same time he refuses to accept responsibility the world requires an adult to have. He does not want to follow the system. His sister, Phoebe is the person who ends up making Holden realize he needs to grow up. She sees through his flaws and calls him out, similar to how the reader does. Watching Phoebe on the carousel, Holden finally understands kids need to fall through the rye field in order to evolve. Being at the age where I am applying to college I can relate to Holden's resistance to change. The adult world does put a lot of pressure on kids to follow a path. It almost makes me wish I could stay the same age forever. However, I realize that I do not have to become what society wants me to. I can follow my own path. Also I am encouraged not to be the loser Holden ends up becoming.

Overall The Catcher in the Rye, is a book you can love or hate for equally good reasons. I believe every teenager should read this book because it does encourage thought. You do not have to like Holden, but just listen to what Salinger is trying to teach. It is ironic because schools are behaving like Holden by trying to prevent kids from reading the book. They are trying to preserve kids' innocence. However, like Holden, they need to learn that in order to become a better person, one needs to lose their innocence. As long as teachers properly educate kids on the book, there should be no problem.    




Saturday, December 14, 2013

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug Review/Rant

This is a review/rant of The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug. I will review the movie in its entirety. I will tell you when I am about to discuss spoilers, so I will not spoil the ending for you.

I will start off with what I liked about the movie. Watching these movies I do feel like I am in the world of Tolkien. The sets and environments are beautiful. The acting is also good. In this movie Thorin's character gets more development as he become more greedy. Gandalf is bad ass as always, but he does not appear that much in this movie. Bilbo Baggins is great. He is my favorite character in these movies because I have always seen a bit of myself in him. I think any person that was thrown into Bilbo's position would have the same reactions and character evolution. A lot of the fight scenes are awesome too. The fight when the group is fighting the orcs down the river is the best because they do a lot of creative sequences.

Smaug is the best part of the movie. He is the most bad ass dragon in not just movie, but fantasy history as well. They captured his character perfectly. I need to give credit to the animation department. The details on Smaug are wonderful and they made him appear arrogant, old, and fierce. He also moves like how a ginormous dragon would move. It must have been a nightmare to animate him. Smaug's voice is like a threatening version of Mufassa's voice from The Lion King. It is intimidating. The interaction between him an Bilbo was the high light of the movie.

Now I will go into what I hated about the movie. Three major things damaged this movie. The first is Tauriel. She has no reason to exist. I have no idea why they thought it was a good idea to put her in this story. Did feminists demand a female character? In this movie Tauriel's story is that she falls in love with Kili the dwarf, but Legolas also has a crush on her. That means they added an unnecessary love story that just wastes time and makes the movie longer than it needs to be. What makes it worse is that it is a love-triangle. Love-triangles NEVER work! Who thought of that stupid idea? I understand putting Legolas in the movie, but Tauriel was a terrible idea. Also if you have read the book and know that Tauriel was created for the film franchise then it is obvious what will happen to her in the next movie.

Secondly, the pacing gets too slow in the last act of the movie. The movie has Bilbo and the dwarves running away from Smaug for like half-an-hour. It lost all of its excitement. Other scenes could have been shorter or cut entirely.

Before I go on to what I hated about the movie the most I will warn you that this section contains spoilers because I will talk about the ending to the movie. So you should skip this next paragraph if you do not want to be spoiled.

I hated where the movie left off. It should have ended after Bard kills Smaug. The title of the movie is called, The Hobbit: The DESOLATION of Smaug, but there is NO desolation of Smaug. This movie should have been called, The Hobbit: Before The Desolation of Smaug or The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug Will Take Place in the Next Film. The film ends with Smaug heading to Esgaroth. If they had cut out all that crap of Tauriel and shortened some scenes we would have had gotten to the part where Bard kills Smaug. I had the same problem in the last movie too. All the scenes that were created to connect The Hobbit to The Lord of the Rings should have been left out and put in the extended addition. Tolkien himself once tried to connect The Hobbit to The Lord of the Rings, but realized he could not because The Hobbit was not supposed to be connected to The Lord of the Rings. The Hobbit is supposed to be a children's fairy tale. In the beginning of the movie Bilbo already showed signs of being obsessed with the ring, even though he does not in the book.

Overall this movie just confirmed to me that the reason they stretched the movie series into a trilogy was to make more money. The story suffers for it. The movie itself is okay. If they had cut out Tauriel and shorten some scenes, this movie could have been good. It could have ended with an action packed scene. However, those blunders almost ruined the movie for me. The last film in this trilogy will be purely action. Maybe it will make up for this.  


Sunday, December 8, 2013

The Hunger Games (1st Movie) Review

Since Catching Fire has gotten great reviews declaring the movie "outstanding" from critics, web surfers, and my piers, I figured that I would check out the first movie. When The Hunger Games came out last year it did not make a huge impact. While it was definitely popular, it was not like a Harry Potter movie where you had to see it when it came out in order to fit in. The Hunger Games was ignorable. That is why I did not see it.

However, now that the second movie has been super successful and is said to be hundreds of times better than the first movie, I decided to watch the first movie. It was good, but not great.

The set up is nice. I know a lot of people claim it rips off Battle Royal, but I have never heard off it before, so it does not effect my opinion. The movie does a good job of introducing this cruel world. I like how the rich people dress up in these ridiculous costumes. It is serial. The lady reminds me of Depp's Mad Hatter. The games themselves were done nice to. I felt the impact of the kids dying. When the Hunger Games start and it shows the older kids killing the younger children, the movie did not hold back. Granted more blood could have been shown, but the movie still gave us the sense of savageness the games represent. Rue's death was powerful in my opinion. The riot scene after it made it even better. The Hunger Games showed how humans can destroy each other and even come together in tough times. Rue helps Katniss and develops a strong bond even though they will have to kill each other and the alliance only supports one another for their own selfish gain.

I was rooting for Katniss the whole way. She is a good heroine, however she can be a little bland at times. Her boyfriend was not interesting. Also I wish they showed more of society's cruelty, but it looks like that is covered in the second movie.

If you have not seen The Hunger Games, I recommend you see it. I cannot say everybody will love it, but it is worth a watch. Especially since the fan base for it is growing exponentially.